TribLIVE
Blogs | Sports | News
Chipped Ice

« Font size »
Decrease | Reset |Increase

Crosby out for ASG, with Malkin very likely to miss.

A story will post soon on the www.triblive.com site, but multiple sources confirmed early this morning that C SIDNEY CROSBY(concussion) will definately miss the NHL All-Star Game next Sunday at Carolina. Also, C EVGENI MALKIN is very unlikely to play.

Crosby has missed eight straight games with a concussion. His remaining symptoms include headache and neck soreness.

Malkin has missed the last two games because of a re-aggravated left knee injury. The knee has been a troublesome issue dating to October.

The Penguins are expected to make an official annoucement about Crosby’s All-Star status over the comign days. No final decision has been made about Malkin, though the team believes his chances of playing are slim.

There will be more details in the web story when it posts, but the bottom line: No Sid, and very likely no Geno for the ASG. 

–ROSSI

Author: Rob Rossi

Rob Rossi has covered the Penguins for parts of every season that Sidney Crosby has played in Pittsburgh. So, since 2005. He has led the Trib's NHL coverage since 2007, when he became the primary Penguins beat reporter. He joined the Tribune-Review in November 2002. Rossi, 35, is local chapter president of the Professional Hockey Writers' Association. He also dabbles in radio, as ClearChannel's "Penguins Insider," and TV, as "NHL Insider" for Root Sports Pittsburgh, and as a semi-regular contributor to The Final Word, a Sunday sports show that airs on WPXI. In 2012, Rossi was recognized nationally by Penn State's John Curley Center for Sports Journalism for his coverage of youth sports for a Trib series that investigated concussion protocol. In 2013, he teamed with Carl Prine for an investigative piece about athletes' charities what was honored regionally. A graduate of West Virginia University and Keystone Oaks High School, Rossi was raised in Crafton and Green Tree and currently resides in Brookline. He is currently working on the authorized biography of Evgeni Malkin. Follow him on Twitter: @RobRossi_Trib

Comments

  1. OneTimer says:

    Why Rule 48 doesn’t go far enough….
    The David Steckel hit on Crosby is a classic example: As noted by reporter David Molinari, “Those who believe the hit was inadvertent can look at a replay and come away convinced they are correct. Those who have no doubt that Steckel knew exactly what he was doing can watch the same footage, then point to it as evidence that they are right.” What all can agree on is that Crosby’s head was the sole point of contact and that he has missed the past 8 games and counting with a concussion. (http://tiny.cc/gu45r)

    Within the comment section on multiple Caps blogsites, there are assurances from Cap’s fans that “Steckel tried to avoid Crosby…dipped shoulder etc” exposed as delusions by Steckel’s own account when he said he “never saw Crosby, and didn’t realize anyone was there.”

  2. OneTimer says:

    Part 2

    When Bruce Boudreau was quoted in The Star saying that “the team KIDDED STECKEL ABOUT THE HIT.” (Laughing about inflicting a serious injury on another player is as low as a human being can get. Doesn’t matter who it is.) The comment’s post said “I’m sure this was before the team realized that Crosby was injured” again exposed as delusion by Boudreau’s further comments.
    Clearly leaving “INTENT” as part of the criteria for judging headshots and penalties for them is setting the League up for perceived failures, controversies and complaints as everyone’s mind reader abilities seem to rest on rooting interests for their team and players. (A suspension for dirty play during the signature Winter Classic with HBO camera coverage would not have been good press for the League after all).
    Intent is impossible to guess, and as long as it is criteria for headshot calls, fines, suspensions and penalties will be impossible to get right. The idea gaining strength is the concept that the NHL adopted years ago regarding high sticks penalties. “Players have to be responsible for their sticks. If they hit someone, regardless of reason, it is a 2-minute penalty. If they draw blood, it is 4 and so on.” This is as clear-cut a rule as can be found in hockey and means no one needs to be a mind reader. Head hits need to be eliminated from the game. This rule change would move us a step closer to letting the players have a role in making that happen.

  3. Shawn says:

    Rob, look at you. You have your own graphic on the NHL Network. Not bad.

    I agree with One Timer. You are responsible for your stick no matter what. Why not your shoulders and elbows?

    Also, IF you are naive enough to believe that guys like Steckel don’t know how to make dirty plays look innocent, fine…

    BUT, Hedman very clearly elbowed a guy whose numbers were showing to him, rammed him head first into the glass from behind, the head was the principle point of contact, etc. etc.

    You could have called…elbowing, boarding, checking from behind, Rule 48, roughing…almost anything. Why has this hit been deemed acceptable?

Other Blogs
Sports: Dejan Kovacevic | Steel Mill | Chipped Ice | Bucco Blog | Sitting Ringside | Pitt Locker Room | Penn State Sports | H.S. Sports Insiders
News: This Just In | Trib List
» Top TribLIVE.com Sports
» Top TribLIVE.com News
» Top TribLIVE.com Breaking News