With the Pirates still in contention in the National League Central Division in late June, talk is turning to their trading for a power presence to add some pop to the middle of the batting order.
Bautista is following a 54-home run, 124-RBI breakthrough 2010 with another season of unprecedented power numbers, at least for him. By going 1-for-3 with three RBI, including a fourth-inning home run off Kevin Correia, Bautista is tied for the major-league lead with 24 homers to go with 52 RBI this season. He never hit more than 16 homers or 63 RBI in his three seasons with the Pirates, from 2006-08, before being dealt for Robinzon Diaz.
Which brings me to the worst trades in Pirates history.
At least, in my lifetime.
My colleague, Bob Cohn, tells me that you evaluate a trade the same way you do talent: You know it when you see it. In that case, Bautista-for-Diaz will go down as one of the most lopsided deals in club history.
While Bautista showed some flashes of power with the Pirates, they never could have predicted this. (Nor could they have afforded him the next four seasons at $14 million per, although his five-year deal with Toronto is looking like a bargain). Here’s a look at Bautista’s numbers with the Bucs:
Year Games HR RBI BA OBP SLG OPS
2006 117 16 51 .235 .335 .420 .755
2007 142 15 63 .254 .339 .414 .753
2008 107 12 44 .238 .313 .405 .718
Perhaps the Pirates gave up on Bautista too soon, but the Blue Jays deserve credit for tweaking his plate approach and cultivating his power in 2009, when he batted .235/.349/.408/.757 with 13 homers and 40 RBI in 113 games. That’s why I’ll leave Bautista off my top five worst trades:
5. Chris Young and Jon Searles to Montreal for Matt Herges (2002): What makes this trade so bad is not that the Pirates had invested a million-dollar signing bonus on the 6-foot-10 right-hander, a 2000 third-round pick out of Princeton, or that he has a 49-34 record and 3.74 ERA over eight seasons but rather that they cut Herges in spring training.
4. Willie Randolph, Dock Ellis and Ken Brett to New York Yankees for Doc Medich (1976): A one-sided deal that ranks among the worst in baseball history, according to Traded author Doug Decatur, who ranks such things. I’m more forgiving, even though Randolph was a six-time All-Star, because Medich was involved in a nine-player trade with the Oakland A’s that brought second baseman Phil Garner to the Pirates, who won the 1979 World Series. Garner was twice an All-Star with the Bucs, in 1980 and ’81.
(An aside: Garner also had one of the best nicknames on a team full of them, as those Pirates had Willie “Pops” Stargell at first, Scrap Iron at second, Bill “Mad Dog” Matlock at third and Dave “Cobra” Parker in right).
3. Jason Schmidt and John Vander Wal to San Francisco for Armando Rios and Ryan Vogelsong (2001): In an ominous sign for Dave Littlefield, this was his first trade, the Pirates dealt their 28-year-old ace before he hit free agency. Schmidt only went 78-37 with a 3.36 ERA with the Giants and twice was a top-five finalist for the Cy Young Award. Neither Rios nor Vogelsong made much of an impact here.
2. Aramis Ramirez and Kenny Lofton to the Chicago Cubs for Jose Hernandez, Bobby Hill and Matt Bruback (2003): This was a straight salary dump for the cash-strapped club, which was in violation of MLB’s debt-ratio rule. But to give away not only Lofton, one of the best leadoff hitters in baseball, but also the franchise player Ramirez, who had five consecutive seasons of 25 homers or more, was a crime that became even more cruel once we got a look at Hernandez and Hill. The Pirates have been searching for a long-term replacement at third ever since.
1. Willie Greene, Scott Ruskin and a player to be named later to Montreal for Zane Smith (1990): This is where you can feel free to disagree — and I expect many of you will — because Smith delivered. He was 6-2 with a 1.30 ERA in 10 starts, including three complete games and two shutouts, to help the Pirates win a tight NL East division race. That earned Smith a four-year contract with the Pirates, and he went 47-41 with a 3.35 ERA in that span, including 30-20 between ’90 and ’92, when the Pirates won three consecutive division titles.
But what transpired between Aug. 8 and Aug. 16 of 1990 is what sours me on this deal. That the Pirates included the top prospect in their farm system only conspired to set them on an 18-year streak of losing seasons. That’s because the “player to be named later” was outfielder Moises Alou, a former first-round pick (No. 2 overall in 1986).
Giving up Greene, another a former first-rounder (18th in 1989), was worth it even though the third baseman/right fielder played nine seasons in the majors. He had a career .234 batting average, hit 86 home runs with 307 RBI. And Ruskin, who was 2-2 with a 3.02 ERA with two saves with the Pirates in ’90, was 11-9 with a 3.95 ERA in four major-league seasons.
But Alou became a six-time All-Star in 16 seasons, hit 332 homers and had career numbers of .303/.369/.516/.885. He could have been the star player the Pirates so desperately needed to replace Bobby Bonilla in right field and in the cleanup spot, the All-Star to fill the void when Barry Bonds left.
Instead, we watched a slow, steady decline.
What makes the Smith-for-Alou deal so bad in my eyes is that the Pirates mortgaged their future for a chance to win a World Series. While Smith helped them win three consecutive division titles, the Pirates never won the pennant, let alone played for the world championship in those years. The Pirates could have included any other player in their system and the deal would have been a smashing success — Bleacher Report still ranks it as one of the top 10 waiver-wire deals — but adding Alou was a major mistake.
That should serve as a warning to Pirates GM Neal Huntington when looking to make a deal so this club can contend for a championship. It’s one thing to add a valuable piece to your club, but be careful that you don’t give up a more valuable one in the process.